Sunday, May 24, 2020

A Military Officer At The Time - 1674 Words

Constantine was born in Naissus, upper Moesia on February 27th 285 ad, and was the son of Helena who was a barmaid. His father Constantius Chlorus was a military officer at the time. In 293 AD, while his father constantius was at the rank of Caesar, Constantine attended the court of Diocletian. His father was given the control of Gaul ( Fance). He was soon after promoted to Caesar. Rise of Diocletian Third century Rome was run down by constant barbarous attacks from the north. Diocletian becomes Rome s new emperor. He proposed new ways on how the frontiers should be defended, creating a mobile imperial army. One of his most skilled soldiers was Constantine 17 years old at the time. While under Diocletian s rule Constantine was a soldier†¦show more content†¦He worked with a variety of pagan and Christian scholars. Christianity became my fluent within the Roman Empire. The religion began taking over building structures and was starting to flourish. During that time there were widespread persecutions of Christians in 303 AD. There were large amounts of arrests, vandalism of churches, and executions in Rome. ( biography) Only about ten percent of the Roman population had Christian beliefs passed down to them at the time of the crisis. (patterns). Diocletian believed that the only way to achieve complete unification or Rome and complete control over the Pagan religion was b y destroying the Christian beliefs within the whole Roman Empire. Constantine’s achievements. Later on Constantine was proving much promise and was seen to have much potential when serving under the Diocletian s and Caesar Galerius when going up against the Persians. Two years later in 305 ad he started opposing such actions against the Christian people and left the Galerius court. He later joined his father in Britain where he made a base at York. â€Å" My father revered the Christian God and uniformly prospered, while the emperors who worshiped the heathen gds died a miserable death; therefore, that I may enjoy a happy life and reign, will imitate the example of my father and join myslef to the cause of the Christians, who are growing daily, while the heathen are diminishing† Constantine. His father died

Wednesday, May 13, 2020

Much Ado About Nothing

Much Ado About Nothing Much Ado About Nothing is a comedy by William Shakespeare,which has remained popular among the readers, actors, directors and theater-goers for more than four centuries. So, what is it that makes it so distinguished? One of the main advantages of the play is its well-composed, funny and fascinating plot. The story describes the adventures of two pairs of lovers Benedick and Beatrice, and Claudio and Hero. Benedick and Beatrice claim to hate each other and are engaged in a verbal war, proclaiming their scorn for love, marriage and each other. Claudio and Hero, on the other hand, are deeply in love with one another and are happily preparing for the wedding. In the course of action Benedick and Beatrice are tricked into confessing their love for each other, but Claudio at the same time is tricked into rejecting Hero at the altar by a villain Don John. However, Dogberry, a Constable who is a master of the funny and foolish play on words, accidentally discovers the evil trickery of the villain. In the end, Don John is arrested and the young lovers can happily celebrate the marriage of two couples. Another feature of the play that accounts for it popularity is the exquisiteness of the language with fine rhymes and wonderful subtle irony. Puns and play of words make the dialogue bright, vivid and exciting and the constant use of double meanings with certain implications leaves both the characters and the reader uncertain about the end. The main theme of the comedy is love, which is the favorite subject of Shakespeare. However, this time love is depicted not as passion or an overwhelming irresistible force, but as a feeling possessing also a funny, comic and ironic side. So, the action-packed plot, wonderful verbal implementation and the unusual handling of the love theme is something which makes the play so successful.

Wednesday, May 6, 2020

Nature vs. Nuture Free Essays

An Overarching View of Nature vs. Nature Katonia H. Dunaway Coppin State University Nature vs. We will write a custom essay sample on Nature vs. Nuture or any similar topic only for you Order Now Nurture 2 You got your brown eyes from your mother and your height from your father. But where did you get your thrill seeking personality and your talent for basketball. Did you get your eyes from your mom and your natural skill from your dad, or was it predetermined by your genes? Nature vs. Nurture 3 The nature versus nurture debate is one of the oldest issues in psychology. The debate centers on the relative contributions of genetic inheritance and environmental factors to human development. Some philosophers such as Plato and Descartes suggested that certain things are inborn, or that they simply occur naturally regardless of environmental influences. Other well-known thinkers such as John Locke believed in what is known as tabula rosa, which suggests that the mind begins as a blank slate (2). According to this notion, everything that we are and all of our knowledge is determined by our experience. For example, when a person achieves tremendous academic success, did they do so because they are genetically predisposed to be successful, or is it a result of an enriched environment (2). Today, the majority of experts believe that behavior and development are influence by both nature and nurture. However, the issue still rages on in many areas, such as in the debate on the origins of homosexuality and influences on intelligence. Nature vs. Nurture 4 Nature- Heredity Scientists have known for years that traits such as eye color and hair color are determined by specific genes encoded in each human cell. The Nature Theory takes things a step further to say that more abstract traits such as intelligence, personality, aggression, and sexual orientation are also encoded in an individual’s DNA(4). While it’s clear that physical characteristics are hereditary, the genetic waters get a bit murkier when it comes to an individual’s behavior, intelligence, and personality. Ultimately, the old argument of nature vs. nurture has never really been won. We do not yet know how much of what we are is determined by our DNA and how much by our life experience. But we do know that ultimately both play a part. It has been reported that the use of the terms â€Å"nature† and â€Å"nurture† as a convenient catch-phrase for the roles of heredity and environment in human development can be traced back to the 13th century France (1). Scientists think that people behave as they do according to genetic predispositions or even â€Å"animal instincts. † This is known as the â€Å"nature† theory of human behavior (5). Other scientists believe that people think and behave in certain ways because they are taught to do so. This is known as the â€Å"nurture† theory of human behavior (5). Nature vs. Nurture 5 Fast-growing understanding of the human genome has recently made it clear that both sides are partly right. Nature endows us with inborn abilities and traits; nurture takes these genetic tendencies and molds them as we learn and mature. But that’s not all. The â€Å"nature vs. nurture† debate still rages on, as scientist fight over how much of whom we are is shaped by genes. Nurture – Environment While not discounting that genetic tendencies may exist, supporters of the nurture theory believe they ultimately don’t matter and that our behavioral aspects originate only from the environmental factors of our upbringing. Studies on infant and child temperament have revealed the most crucial evidence for nurture theories and how much by the environment (6). American psychologist John Watson, best known for his controversial experiments with a young orphan named Albert, demonstrated that the acquisition of a phobia could be explained by classical conditioning. A strong proponent of environmental learning, he said: Give me a dozen healthy infants, well-formed, and my own specified world to bring them up in and I’ll guarantee to take any one at random and train him to become any type of specialist I might select†¦ regardless of his talents, penchants, tendencies, abilities, vocations and race of his ancestors(3). Nature vs. Nurture 6 Harvard psychologist B. F. Skinner’s early experiments produced pigeons that could dance, do figure eights, and play tennis. Today known as the father of behavioral science, he eventually went on to prove that human behavior could be conditioned in much the same way as animals (4). If environment didn’t play a part in determining an individual’s traits and behaviors, then identical twins should, theoretically, be exactly the same in all respects, even if reared apart. But a number of studies show that they are never exactly alike, even though they are remarkably similar in most respects (1). So, was the way we behave engrained in us before we were born? Or has it developed over time in response to our experiences? Researchers on all sides of the nature vs. nurture debate agree that the link between a gene and a behavior is not the same as cause and effect. While a gene may increase the likelihood that you’ll behave in a particular way, it does not make people do things. This in turn means that we still get to choose who we’ll be when we grow up and the argument of nature vs. nurture continues to have theorist explore the question. References 1. Fierro, Pamela. Identical or Fraternal? You Can’t Always Tell by Looking Retrieved from http://www. about. com Guide. 2. Howe, M. J. A. (1997). IQ in Question: The truth about intelligence. London: Sage. 3. Hughes, Neiman. Nature vs. Nurture Ended. Retrieved from http://www. HumanNurtureome. org. 4. Johnson, Ramon. Nature versus Nurture. Newsletter, (2008, November 2) Pages 1-4. Retrieved February 28, 2010 from http://www. about. com. Guide. 5. Murray, Ralph. Nature vs. Nature Intelligence. Retrieved from http://www. wilderdom. com. 6. Powell, Kimberly. (2004, September 28). Are We Really Born That Way? Retrieved February 28, 2010 from http://www. docstoc. com. How to cite Nature vs. Nuture, Papers

Monday, May 4, 2020

Hamlets procrastination led to his depression Essay Example For Students

Hamlets procrastination led to his depression Essay Hamlets procrastination led to his depression Hamlet is the Prince of Denmark, who is seeking revenge for his fathers death. The ghost of the King, Hamlets father, tells Hamlet to . . . revenge his foul and most unnatural murder . Since his father asked him, he finds it his duty to do as he says. In this essay, I am going to prove that Hamlet puts off what he has to do until a future time, which leads him to his depression. He builds things up inside of him until the point that he is not able to handle anything, or lacks courage, skill, and will to do something. In his first soliloquy, Oh that this too too solid flesh would melt . . . , Hamlet talks about the first thing that has made him melancholy, or sad. He says that his mother barely mourned her husbands death and a month later she remarried. To try and make himself feel better, Hamlet makes a joke about it when he tells Horatio, The funeral baked meats did coldly furnish forth the marriage tables. Everyone else knows how much the remarriage of his mother has bothered him. The soliloquy in act one scene two shows how upset he is at his mother and himself. He believes he is better off dead because no one seems to understand what he is feeling. He shows that he is upset at his mother because she got married in such a hurry. It makes him think that maybe his uncle and his mother had an affair before King Hamlet died. He says that his father used to treat her like she was everything and she degraded herself by marrying someone whom treats her as if she was nothing. For example, King Claudius, Hamlets stepfather always asks Gertrude, Hamlets mother to do things for him. Claudius tells her to talk to Hamlet so he can listen in on their conversation, without even asking Gertrude if she is willing to do that. When the play begins, the King is already dead so we do not know how he treated Gertrude. What we do know is that when the ghost of the king came back to talk to Hamlet and tell him about the situation, he tells Hamlet that he should leave Gertrude alone and to try as best as he can no to get her involved. Not only in this soliloquy, but also in other ones in this play, Hamlet talks about dying. In his soliloquy in the third act, Hamlet talks about dying so he will not have to face the human suffering that everyone had to go through in life. Hamlet, at this point, believes that everything he is living for is gone. The one person that he looked up to is now dead and he does not have a male figure he can look up to and set an example for himself of how he wants to be. His mother is blind and does not see the way Claudius has been treating and she is also blind because she does not realize that Claudius is the one that killed her husband. The last reason that he is upset, and the one thing that does occur during the play was when Ophelia started to neglect Hamlet. Hamlet loves Ophelia and after everything started going downhill for him, he began losing the one person he cared so much about. Hamlet gave hints during the play that he wanted to die and that he is depressed, even to people that he did not trust, like Polonius. Polonius asks him to come out of the air and Hamlets response was to go into his grave. When Rosencrantz and Guilderstern first visit Denmark, Hamlet refers to it as a prison, because he does not like being there anymore. He is having problems with everyone around him and he would rather be alone but at the same time have someone he can talk to and trust. .u7b02ac3579835423a4b165629bb1b309 , .u7b02ac3579835423a4b165629bb1b309 .postImageUrl , .u7b02ac3579835423a4b165629bb1b309 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u7b02ac3579835423a4b165629bb1b309 , .u7b02ac3579835423a4b165629bb1b309:hover , .u7b02ac3579835423a4b165629bb1b309:visited , .u7b02ac3579835423a4b165629bb1b309:active { border:0!important; } .u7b02ac3579835423a4b165629bb1b309 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u7b02ac3579835423a4b165629bb1b309 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u7b02ac3579835423a4b165629bb1b309:active , .u7b02ac3579835423a4b165629bb1b309:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u7b02ac3579835423a4b165629bb1b309 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u7b02ac3579835423a4b165629bb1b309 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u7b02ac3579835423a4b165629bb1b309 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u7b02ac3579835423a4b165629bb1b309 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u7b02ac3579835423a4b165629bb1b309:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u7b02ac3579835423a4b165629bb1b309 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u7b02ac3579835423a4b165629bb1b309 .u7b02ac3579835423a4b165629bb1b309-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u7b02ac3579835423a4b165629bb1b309:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: 2pac Essay Two other people that Hamlet did not trust were Rosencrantz and Guilderstern. He tells them that he has lost all his mirth . . . and indeed it goes .