Wednesday, August 26, 2020

A Study On Sharing The Wealth Philosophy Essay

A Study On Sharing The Wealth Philosophy Essay There are numerous individuals on the planet who are as of now living in terrible conditions that incorporate lack of healthy sustenance, hunger, and contaminated drinking water. While these individuals are living in such unpleasant conditions, I am carrying on with an agreeable life and have a propensity for exploiting certain extravagances that are accessible to me, however not to somebody living in such grievous conditions. In the event that a worldwide duty was instated trying to end hunger by contributing a minor one dollar seven days, at that point I would be more than ready to help this development. There are some other people who might consent to and bolster this assessment, however there are likewise some who can't help contradicting this expense. Various people who might have changing feelings on this thought for a worldwide expense are Thomas Pogge, John McMillian, Peter Singer, and Garrett Hardin. Thomas Pogge, as appeared in his paper, â€Å"World Poverty and Human Righ ts,† would appear to concur with the thought of a worldwide assessment to help those out of luck. He composes that we have obligations, â€Å"not to open individuals to perilous neediness and obligations to shield them from hurts for which we would be effectively responsible† (Pogge 319). At the end of the day, he accepts that the individuals who live in wealthier countries ought not permit others to tumble to sicknesses in the event that they can bear the cost of not to. This would incorporate leaving individuals to simply starve when one can contribute a little bit of our assets to them. Pogge additionally examines the subject of how more extravagant nations, for example, the United States, strip these less fortunate territories of their own regular assets. He makes reference to that these nations to pay for it, however there is an issue with this installment. â€Å"The installments we make for asset imports go to the leaders of the asset rich nations, with no worry about whether they are justly chosen or if nothing else negligibly mindful to the requirements to the individuals they rule† (Pogge 320). Despite the fact that the more extravagant countries might be paying for the assets they remove, they are paying to pioneers who may not share this installment reasonably with those that they rule. In view of this thought, maybe Pogge would be much increasingly steady of this worldwide assessment in the event that it could be ensured that the assets from the expense would be put in the right hands and the individuals who need it will really get it. Subside Singer is someone else who might consent to this idea of a worldwide tax†to a degree. In his paper, â€Å"World Poverty and Hunger,† he expresses that, â€Å"I (Singer) start with the supposition that anguish and demise from absence of food, safe house, and clinical consideration are bad† (Singer 332). It would be an undeniable end to come to from this that he would conc ur that each and every individual (who can bear to do as such) contributing something to individuals who are experiencing those things would be something to be thankful for. This is confirmed when he expresses that, â€Å"if it is in our capacity to keep something awful from occurring, with-out in this manner yielding anything of equivalent good significance, we should, ethically, to do it† (Singer 332). Once more, this would prompt the end that he would be agreeable to this duty.

Saturday, August 22, 2020

Heart of Darkness by Joseph Conrad Essay

The short section composed by Joseph Conrad communicated through portrayal his impression of Africa. The storyteller in the story was Marlow. In one piece of the story, Marlow relates his encounters as he was venturing up the Congo River. The pictures utilized in the story delineate a downbeat state of mind. The Congo River helped him to remember the ancient occasions when nature flourished the earth. It was arranged in nearness to profound and spooky woods, where perilous animals prowled. The backwoods were unwelcoming and the waters streamed no specific way. Marlow however the spot to be separated from this present reality saying, â€Å"†¦you thought yourself beguiled and cut off perpetually from all that you had known once. † These pictures suggest contrasts between the perspective of European and African culture, on account of how they see Africa. The African individuals consider the to be as their home and their territory. It is their most precious belonging from where their way of life is profound established. It is their lifestyle. The European perspectives African terrains as lacking. There is a requirement for human advancement, and there is a need to dispose of the â€Å"barbaric† lifestyle. Conrad sees no delight in the abundance of the African individuals. There is no delight, he says, in the sound woodlands and streams. There is nothing valuable about it. Be that as it may, the African individuals consider their to be land as a gem where they can be free watching their way of life and their favored lifestyle. It isn't uninvolved with the world, yet it is unified with the earth since its kin make the most of its local and natural productivity for what it's worth. The African individuals acquire their food from chasing in the woods, and they cover up in the backwoods to shield themselves from the foe. The stream is their wellspring of life. Allegorically, the pictures delineated in the entry likewise reprimand the way of life of the African individuals as dim and untamed. Marlow thought back, â€Å"†¦it came looking like a tumultuous and loud dream, recalled with wonder among the mind-boggling real factors of this odd universe of plants, and water, and quiet. † However, according to the African individuals, their way of life recognizes who they are as people and who they are as a gathering of individuals. The two pictures previously mentioned obviously characterize a line that partitions the perspectives of the European individuals and the African individuals.

Saturday, August 15, 2020

Seeple Snapshot Oscar Pocasangre, MPA COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY - SIPA Admissions Blog

Seeple Snapshot Oscar Pocasangre, MPA COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY - SIPA Admissions Blog Oscar Pocasangre Master of Public Administration (MPA) Concentration: Economic and Political Development (EPD) Specialization: Advanced Policy and Economic Analysis (APEA) Oscar speaking at a panel on emerging markets at the OECD as a representative for SIPA’s Center on Economic and Global Governance (CGEG) What did you do before SIPA? Prior to SIPA, I worked for two years at the MIT Poverty Action Lab (J-PAL) as a policy and training analyst in their Chile office. I focused on creating courses on randomized trials for policymakers and also worked with governments and NGOs throughout the region in promoting the use of good evidence when crafting public policies. I was also able to write up various policy publications, including a book chapter on conditional cash transfers. What has been the best part of your SIPA experience? There have been many highlights! Academically, I think the highlight has been taking a class with Andrés Velasco, a former finance minister of Chile and former presidential candidate during the Chilean primaries in 2013. He was very accessible as a professor and he was able to combine rigorous theories from political economy and game theory with his personal experience in politics to explore issues that policymakers face in practice. Another highlight was being able to represent SIPA at two conferences in Paris sponsored by the Center on Global Economic Governance. There were many distinguished speakers at the conferences, including Nobel laureate Joseph Stiglitz, the Minister of Finance of France, representatives from the UN and the OECD, among many others. It was a great opportunity to hear what these experts think about the worlds current problems and how to solve them. What kind of work do you hope to do when you graduate? I want to be a university professor and do research on the political economy of development, governance, and ways of using experimental methods to answer questions of political science. So, thats a cool way of saying that I hope to stay in school after I graduate. Can you describe the nature of the SIPA curriculum? The SIPA curriculum is flexible enough that you can choose to focus on the areas that interest you the most and approach these areas from both theoretical and practical perspectives. SIPA does tend to emphasize practical experience. One of the big values and strengths of the SIPA curriculum is that it requires students to take a series of economics and statistics courses, which I think, are vital for anyone involved in policymaking. Do you feel like you have gotten to know some of the faculty members? Yes! This has been one of the other highlights of my time at SIPA. I find that professors here are very accessible and willing to help and offer advice. Many students dont take much advantage of the office hours of the faculty, but these are great opportunities to get to know professors. Ive been able to work closely with one faculty member on a research project. As an aspiring academic, this has been an incredible experience and opportunity.

Sunday, May 24, 2020

A Military Officer At The Time - 1674 Words

Constantine was born in Naissus, upper Moesia on February 27th 285 ad, and was the son of Helena who was a barmaid. His father Constantius Chlorus was a military officer at the time. In 293 AD, while his father constantius was at the rank of Caesar, Constantine attended the court of Diocletian. His father was given the control of Gaul ( Fance). He was soon after promoted to Caesar. Rise of Diocletian Third century Rome was run down by constant barbarous attacks from the north. Diocletian becomes Rome s new emperor. He proposed new ways on how the frontiers should be defended, creating a mobile imperial army. One of his most skilled soldiers was Constantine 17 years old at the time. While under Diocletian s rule Constantine was a soldier†¦show more content†¦He worked with a variety of pagan and Christian scholars. Christianity became my fluent within the Roman Empire. The religion began taking over building structures and was starting to flourish. During that time there were widespread persecutions of Christians in 303 AD. There were large amounts of arrests, vandalism of churches, and executions in Rome. ( biography) Only about ten percent of the Roman population had Christian beliefs passed down to them at the time of the crisis. (patterns). Diocletian believed that the only way to achieve complete unification or Rome and complete control over the Pagan religion was b y destroying the Christian beliefs within the whole Roman Empire. Constantine’s achievements. Later on Constantine was proving much promise and was seen to have much potential when serving under the Diocletian s and Caesar Galerius when going up against the Persians. Two years later in 305 ad he started opposing such actions against the Christian people and left the Galerius court. He later joined his father in Britain where he made a base at York. â€Å" My father revered the Christian God and uniformly prospered, while the emperors who worshiped the heathen gds died a miserable death; therefore, that I may enjoy a happy life and reign, will imitate the example of my father and join myslef to the cause of the Christians, who are growing daily, while the heathen are diminishing† Constantine. His father died

Wednesday, May 13, 2020

Much Ado About Nothing

Much Ado About Nothing Much Ado About Nothing is a comedy by William Shakespeare,which has remained popular among the readers, actors, directors and theater-goers for more than four centuries. So, what is it that makes it so distinguished? One of the main advantages of the play is its well-composed, funny and fascinating plot. The story describes the adventures of two pairs of lovers Benedick and Beatrice, and Claudio and Hero. Benedick and Beatrice claim to hate each other and are engaged in a verbal war, proclaiming their scorn for love, marriage and each other. Claudio and Hero, on the other hand, are deeply in love with one another and are happily preparing for the wedding. In the course of action Benedick and Beatrice are tricked into confessing their love for each other, but Claudio at the same time is tricked into rejecting Hero at the altar by a villain Don John. However, Dogberry, a Constable who is a master of the funny and foolish play on words, accidentally discovers the evil trickery of the villain. In the end, Don John is arrested and the young lovers can happily celebrate the marriage of two couples. Another feature of the play that accounts for it popularity is the exquisiteness of the language with fine rhymes and wonderful subtle irony. Puns and play of words make the dialogue bright, vivid and exciting and the constant use of double meanings with certain implications leaves both the characters and the reader uncertain about the end. The main theme of the comedy is love, which is the favorite subject of Shakespeare. However, this time love is depicted not as passion or an overwhelming irresistible force, but as a feeling possessing also a funny, comic and ironic side. So, the action-packed plot, wonderful verbal implementation and the unusual handling of the love theme is something which makes the play so successful.

Wednesday, May 6, 2020

Nature vs. Nuture Free Essays

An Overarching View of Nature vs. Nature Katonia H. Dunaway Coppin State University Nature vs. We will write a custom essay sample on Nature vs. Nuture or any similar topic only for you Order Now Nurture 2 You got your brown eyes from your mother and your height from your father. But where did you get your thrill seeking personality and your talent for basketball. Did you get your eyes from your mom and your natural skill from your dad, or was it predetermined by your genes? Nature vs. Nurture 3 The nature versus nurture debate is one of the oldest issues in psychology. The debate centers on the relative contributions of genetic inheritance and environmental factors to human development. Some philosophers such as Plato and Descartes suggested that certain things are inborn, or that they simply occur naturally regardless of environmental influences. Other well-known thinkers such as John Locke believed in what is known as tabula rosa, which suggests that the mind begins as a blank slate (2). According to this notion, everything that we are and all of our knowledge is determined by our experience. For example, when a person achieves tremendous academic success, did they do so because they are genetically predisposed to be successful, or is it a result of an enriched environment (2). Today, the majority of experts believe that behavior and development are influence by both nature and nurture. However, the issue still rages on in many areas, such as in the debate on the origins of homosexuality and influences on intelligence. Nature vs. Nurture 4 Nature- Heredity Scientists have known for years that traits such as eye color and hair color are determined by specific genes encoded in each human cell. The Nature Theory takes things a step further to say that more abstract traits such as intelligence, personality, aggression, and sexual orientation are also encoded in an individual’s DNA(4). While it’s clear that physical characteristics are hereditary, the genetic waters get a bit murkier when it comes to an individual’s behavior, intelligence, and personality. Ultimately, the old argument of nature vs. nurture has never really been won. We do not yet know how much of what we are is determined by our DNA and how much by our life experience. But we do know that ultimately both play a part. It has been reported that the use of the terms â€Å"nature† and â€Å"nurture† as a convenient catch-phrase for the roles of heredity and environment in human development can be traced back to the 13th century France (1). Scientists think that people behave as they do according to genetic predispositions or even â€Å"animal instincts. † This is known as the â€Å"nature† theory of human behavior (5). Other scientists believe that people think and behave in certain ways because they are taught to do so. This is known as the â€Å"nurture† theory of human behavior (5). Nature vs. Nurture 5 Fast-growing understanding of the human genome has recently made it clear that both sides are partly right. Nature endows us with inborn abilities and traits; nurture takes these genetic tendencies and molds them as we learn and mature. But that’s not all. The â€Å"nature vs. nurture† debate still rages on, as scientist fight over how much of whom we are is shaped by genes. Nurture – Environment While not discounting that genetic tendencies may exist, supporters of the nurture theory believe they ultimately don’t matter and that our behavioral aspects originate only from the environmental factors of our upbringing. Studies on infant and child temperament have revealed the most crucial evidence for nurture theories and how much by the environment (6). American psychologist John Watson, best known for his controversial experiments with a young orphan named Albert, demonstrated that the acquisition of a phobia could be explained by classical conditioning. A strong proponent of environmental learning, he said: Give me a dozen healthy infants, well-formed, and my own specified world to bring them up in and I’ll guarantee to take any one at random and train him to become any type of specialist I might select†¦ regardless of his talents, penchants, tendencies, abilities, vocations and race of his ancestors(3). Nature vs. Nurture 6 Harvard psychologist B. F. Skinner’s early experiments produced pigeons that could dance, do figure eights, and play tennis. Today known as the father of behavioral science, he eventually went on to prove that human behavior could be conditioned in much the same way as animals (4). If environment didn’t play a part in determining an individual’s traits and behaviors, then identical twins should, theoretically, be exactly the same in all respects, even if reared apart. But a number of studies show that they are never exactly alike, even though they are remarkably similar in most respects (1). So, was the way we behave engrained in us before we were born? Or has it developed over time in response to our experiences? Researchers on all sides of the nature vs. nurture debate agree that the link between a gene and a behavior is not the same as cause and effect. While a gene may increase the likelihood that you’ll behave in a particular way, it does not make people do things. This in turn means that we still get to choose who we’ll be when we grow up and the argument of nature vs. nurture continues to have theorist explore the question. References 1. Fierro, Pamela. Identical or Fraternal? You Can’t Always Tell by Looking Retrieved from http://www. about. com Guide. 2. Howe, M. J. A. (1997). IQ in Question: The truth about intelligence. London: Sage. 3. Hughes, Neiman. Nature vs. Nurture Ended. Retrieved from http://www. HumanNurtureome. org. 4. Johnson, Ramon. Nature versus Nurture. Newsletter, (2008, November 2) Pages 1-4. Retrieved February 28, 2010 from http://www. about. com. Guide. 5. Murray, Ralph. Nature vs. Nature Intelligence. Retrieved from http://www. wilderdom. com. 6. Powell, Kimberly. (2004, September 28). Are We Really Born That Way? Retrieved February 28, 2010 from http://www. docstoc. com. How to cite Nature vs. Nuture, Papers

Monday, May 4, 2020

Hamlets procrastination led to his depression Essay Example For Students

Hamlets procrastination led to his depression Essay Hamlets procrastination led to his depression Hamlet is the Prince of Denmark, who is seeking revenge for his fathers death. The ghost of the King, Hamlets father, tells Hamlet to . . . revenge his foul and most unnatural murder . Since his father asked him, he finds it his duty to do as he says. In this essay, I am going to prove that Hamlet puts off what he has to do until a future time, which leads him to his depression. He builds things up inside of him until the point that he is not able to handle anything, or lacks courage, skill, and will to do something. In his first soliloquy, Oh that this too too solid flesh would melt . . . , Hamlet talks about the first thing that has made him melancholy, or sad. He says that his mother barely mourned her husbands death and a month later she remarried. To try and make himself feel better, Hamlet makes a joke about it when he tells Horatio, The funeral baked meats did coldly furnish forth the marriage tables. Everyone else knows how much the remarriage of his mother has bothered him. The soliloquy in act one scene two shows how upset he is at his mother and himself. He believes he is better off dead because no one seems to understand what he is feeling. He shows that he is upset at his mother because she got married in such a hurry. It makes him think that maybe his uncle and his mother had an affair before King Hamlet died. He says that his father used to treat her like she was everything and she degraded herself by marrying someone whom treats her as if she was nothing. For example, King Claudius, Hamlets stepfather always asks Gertrude, Hamlets mother to do things for him. Claudius tells her to talk to Hamlet so he can listen in on their conversation, without even asking Gertrude if she is willing to do that. When the play begins, the King is already dead so we do not know how he treated Gertrude. What we do know is that when the ghost of the king came back to talk to Hamlet and tell him about the situation, he tells Hamlet that he should leave Gertrude alone and to try as best as he can no to get her involved. Not only in this soliloquy, but also in other ones in this play, Hamlet talks about dying. In his soliloquy in the third act, Hamlet talks about dying so he will not have to face the human suffering that everyone had to go through in life. Hamlet, at this point, believes that everything he is living for is gone. The one person that he looked up to is now dead and he does not have a male figure he can look up to and set an example for himself of how he wants to be. His mother is blind and does not see the way Claudius has been treating and she is also blind because she does not realize that Claudius is the one that killed her husband. The last reason that he is upset, and the one thing that does occur during the play was when Ophelia started to neglect Hamlet. Hamlet loves Ophelia and after everything started going downhill for him, he began losing the one person he cared so much about. Hamlet gave hints during the play that he wanted to die and that he is depressed, even to people that he did not trust, like Polonius. Polonius asks him to come out of the air and Hamlets response was to go into his grave. When Rosencrantz and Guilderstern first visit Denmark, Hamlet refers to it as a prison, because he does not like being there anymore. He is having problems with everyone around him and he would rather be alone but at the same time have someone he can talk to and trust. .u7b02ac3579835423a4b165629bb1b309 , .u7b02ac3579835423a4b165629bb1b309 .postImageUrl , .u7b02ac3579835423a4b165629bb1b309 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u7b02ac3579835423a4b165629bb1b309 , .u7b02ac3579835423a4b165629bb1b309:hover , .u7b02ac3579835423a4b165629bb1b309:visited , .u7b02ac3579835423a4b165629bb1b309:active { border:0!important; } .u7b02ac3579835423a4b165629bb1b309 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u7b02ac3579835423a4b165629bb1b309 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u7b02ac3579835423a4b165629bb1b309:active , .u7b02ac3579835423a4b165629bb1b309:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u7b02ac3579835423a4b165629bb1b309 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u7b02ac3579835423a4b165629bb1b309 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u7b02ac3579835423a4b165629bb1b309 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u7b02ac3579835423a4b165629bb1b309 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u7b02ac3579835423a4b165629bb1b309:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u7b02ac3579835423a4b165629bb1b309 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u7b02ac3579835423a4b165629bb1b309 .u7b02ac3579835423a4b165629bb1b309-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u7b02ac3579835423a4b165629bb1b309:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: 2pac Essay Two other people that Hamlet did not trust were Rosencrantz and Guilderstern. He tells them that he has lost all his mirth . . . and indeed it goes .